Skip to main content

Releasing scissors into the wild

Douglas Adams referred, I think, to all the lost biros that went missing, suggesting they all migrated to some biro planet where they lived a fulfilled life. My office has a similar problem with scissors. I start off with two pairs on my desk and within forty-eight hours I have none.

I've tried searching the house - I do sometimes find them, but more often than not I'm lucky if I can unearth a pair of kitchen scissors or nail clippers.

So a while ago I bought a whole batch of scissors from my supplier and now I keep replacing them as they disappear. I have the theory that if I inject enough into the system, eventually we'll hit saturation and they won't disappear any more.

I haven't made it yet. They still keep disappearing. But the act of opening a fresh packet has started to take on a new significance. I feel like a naturalist, releasing an animal bred in captivity back into the wild. It's strangely satisfying.

Comments

  1. biros, scissors, yes, but also socks and teaspoons. do you suppose they are living happily on a planet together or do they each have their own?

    ReplyDelete
  2. We can but hope they live together in perfect harmony (no Ebony and Ivory sing-alongs, please). Of course there was speculation that we get sent something in return - wire coat hangers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ssh - keep you voice down! Everyone knows that the coathangers are simply waiting for the time when they achieve critical mass and take over the world - they've devastated the banking system already you know...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think somewhere there is a scissorless dimension which is draining off our scissors. And in that dimension, the people don't have heart attacks, they die of sudden unexplained stabbings. They're in quite a panic, too, but Big Pharma is spending all their research dollars or treatment rather than a cure.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm getting much more worried about coat hangers and scissors than I used to be.

    One of the alternative theories to the Big Bang suggests there are two 'branes' floating in multidimensional space that occasionally collide (our universe being one of them). Maybe the scissors go to the other brane.

    I feel, though, this theory needs a bit of expansion, as it doesn't as yet explain why they occasionally turn up around the house, usually in children's rooms.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In order to make your experiment complete, you'd need to attach a ring to each pair as you release them, with the date, and contact details of some sort. Then one day you might get a phone call from, I don't know, maybe Venezuela, saying your scissors had arrived just produced their first brood of tiny coathangers.

    Actually, now I come to think of it, wasn't the theory that the single sock was the larval form of the wire coathanger?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm sure you are right about the sock in the Adams theory. I love the idea of ringing the scissors, though I think I ought to use the modern approach and not just put information on a ring but a tracking device, so I can plot their migration...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's 2010 gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some exp

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why backgammon is a better game than chess

I freely admit that chess, for those who enjoy it, is a wonderful game, but I honestly believe that as a game , backgammon is better (and this isn't just because I'm a lot better at playing backgammon than chess). Having relatively recently written a book on game theory, I have given quite a lot of thought to the nature of games, and from that I'd say that chess has two significant weaknesses compared with backgammon. One is the lack of randomness. Because backgammon includes the roll of the dice, it introduces a random factor into the play. Of course, a game that is totally random provides very little enjoyment. Tossing a coin isn't at all entertaining. But the clever thing about backgammon is that the randomness is contributory without dominating - there is still plenty of room for skill (apart from very flukey dice throws, I can always be beaten by a really good backgammon player), but the introduction of a random factor makes it more life-like, with more of a sense