The Ward Witch / The Book Keeper

The Ward Witch / The Book Keeper - Sarah Painter ****

I'm quite fond of Sarah Painter's Crow Investigations books - an urban fantasy series set in London featuring four magical families in the otherwise normal setting, so I was interested to see what her newish Unholy Island series, based in the same world, but located on an island with a causeway off the North East of England, just north of Holy Island, would be like.

Going on the first two books in the series, the concept and setting is great, but the plot development is initially somewhat glacial. The idea is that Unholy Island has its own, magical nature - unless you are wanted by the island, you will never stay more than two nights and you will forget about any experiences there when you leave. It's a great setting into which Painter deposits a newcomer, Luke, who gets a mixed welcome from around a dozen residents, each a remarkable character, ranging from BandB owner (and ward witch) Esme to the mysterious (and unnerving) three sisters.

The first book, The Ward Witch, sets up the scene, but relatively little happens beyond Luke arriving and introducing the location and characters. Okay, that's not entirely true: there is a murder to be solved, but considering this, it is all surprisingly low key and slow. It's necessary to read it to continue with the rest of the series, but as a standalone novel, it's weak.

Thankfully considerably more happens in the second book, The Book Keeper, the title referring to Luke who takes over the island bookshop after the death in the previous novel. Here the bookshop's magical nature really comes into its own, relationships develop and the island as a whole is under threat. Although it still has a very sedate pace and could, frankly do with a bit more energy - this second book feels significantly better than its predecessor.

Overall, the setting and concept are great and I will certainly read on - I just hope that Painter can inject a bit more of the drive that's at the heart of the Crow novels to stop this series feeling quite so lethargic.

See all of Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly digest for free here

You can buy The Ward Witch from Amazon.co.uk and Amazon.com and also The Book Keeper from Amazon.co.uk and Amazon.com.

Using these links earns us commission at no cost to you

Comments

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's recent gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some ex

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5. However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Which idiot came up with percentage-based gradient signs

Rant warning: the contents of this post could sound like something produced by UKIP. I wish to make it clear that I do not in any way support or endorse that political party. In fact it gives me the creeps. Once upon a time, the signs for a steep hill on British roads displayed the gradient in a simple, easy-to-understand form. If the hill went up, say, one yard for every three yards forward it said '1 in 3'. Then some bureaucrat came along and decided that it would be a good idea to state the slope as a percentage. So now the sign for (say) a 1 in 10 slope says 10% (I think). That 'I think' is because the percentage-based slope is so unnatural. There are two ways we conventionally measure slopes. Either on X/Y coordiates (as in 1 in 4) or using degrees - say at a 15° angle. We don't measure them in percentages. It's easy to visualize a 1 in 3 slope, or a 30 degree angle. Much less obvious what a 33.333 recurring percent slope is. And what's a 100% slope

Search This Blog