My hybrid car confusion

No, I know that picture is not a hybrid car: bear with me.

I have just started the process of buying a plug-in hybrid car. In principle, I'd love to go for the full electric experience, but there are still problems, as I had the opportunity to point out on Newsnight recently. Electric cars are still too expensive - but the same is true of plug-in hybrids. More significantly, there are range issues and the charging infrastructure is both far too sparse and pricey.

My driving pattern consists of a combination of local driving, which the electric part of a modern plug-in hybrid can entirely cover, and 300 mileish round trips, much of it spent in places where chargers are very few and far between - which is why I still need the petrol side.

For the moment, then, I think I've made the right choice. But I embarrassingly realised when taking a look through the manual for the car I am yet to pick up (yes, I'm the sort of person who reads manuals) that I totally misunderstood how most hybrids work. The blame lies firmly with my teenage enthusiasm for trains.

By my mid-teens I'd got past the trainspotting stage, but loved taking train journeys for the sake of it. If I'd been a bit older, part of the enthusiasm would have been steam locomotives - but I was very much of the diesel age, with my favourite engines to travel behind being Deltics (one pictured above) and Westerns. Westerns ran on what had been the GWR - a region of British Rail that retained the eccentric individuality of Isambard Kingdom Brunel by using diesel hydraulic engines. The output of their diesel engines was transmitted to the wheels by a hydraulic transmission. But Deltics followed the far more common mechanism of being diesel electric.

What this meant was that a Deltic's vast diesel engines generated electricity to power its electric motors. When introduced, Deltics were the most powerful single unit diesel locomotives in the world - the rumble of power they made was music to the ear of train lover. The locomotives contained two Deltic diesel engines, originally designed for marine use.

With my familiarity with diesel electric locomotives, it just seemed obvious to me that hybrid cars used the petrol engine to generate electricity to feed electric drive motors. I even had this model in mind when I test drove one. But reading the manual, I discovered the petrol engine has an automatic gearbox. If the car had an electric transmission there would have been no need for a gearbox. The only possibility was that both the electric motor and the petrol engine drove the wheels. Doh. I still don't really understand why this is the case, as it seems unnecessarily complicated, but on looking into it, most hybrids have such 'parallel' setups rather being series hybrids. It just shows that this 'being greener' business remains quite complicated.

Image from Unsplash by Neil Mewes - the Deltic portrayed (on a preserved railway) carries the thistle emblem of the Flying Scotsman (train as opposed to locomotive), which I travelled on in my teens behind a Deltic.

This has been a Green Heretic production. See all my Green Heretic articles here.

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:

Buy me a coffee

See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's 2010 gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some exp...

Why backgammon is a better game than chess

I freely admit that chess, for those who enjoy it, is a wonderful game, but I honestly believe that as a game , backgammon is better (and this isn't just because I'm a lot better at playing backgammon than chess). Having relatively recently written a book on game theory, I have given quite a lot of thought to the nature of games, and from that I'd say that chess has two significant weaknesses compared with backgammon. One is the lack of randomness. Because backgammon includes the roll of the dice, it introduces a random factor into the play. Of course, a game that is totally random provides very little enjoyment. Tossing a coin isn't at all entertaining. But the clever thing about backgammon is that the randomness is contributory without dominating - there is still plenty of room for skill (apart from very flukey dice throws, I can always be beaten by a really good backgammon player), but the introduction of a random factor makes it more life-like, with more of a sense...

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5. However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor...

Search This Blog