Skip to main content

Review: The Nanny State Made Me - Stuart Maconie

I am a great fan of Stuart Maconie's UK travel/music industry books (I confess that, coming from Rochdale to his Wigan, he paints a picture I love). In many ways he has surpassed Bill Bryson, which is saying something. But the one thing I've never been comfortable with is his political alignment. If I position myself as closest to New Labour, he has always felt to the left of this. Of itself it's not a big issue, but I've particularly struggled with his romanticisation of the working class life.

My dad's parents were mill workers in Rochdale most of their lives (my grandad had to play professional cricket to make something to live on when they were laid off in the early 30s). And one thing they always stressed to me - the first in my family to go to university - was that they hadn't wanted the same life for my dad and me. They saw nothing romantic and noble in mill work - it was a means to live and no more.

It's not to say that I don't share Maconie's dislike of those who turn their noses up at Northerners or working class traditions and lifestyles. But it made me a bit wary of taking on this book (sorry it's taken me so long to mention the book). However, I shouldn't have been. It's a well-deserved counter to those who would pull apart the support net of the state. Maconie takes us through the NHS (of course), state schools, buses and trains, the dole, public utilities, public parks, the BBC and more. He's affectionate but never blinkered - happy to point out the failings of state-run organisations, but equally able to make it clear how the alternatives have proved worse.

I was surprised how often I was already aligned with his thinking, despite being to the right of him politically. It helps that he's prepared to actually think things through rather than react in a knee-jerk fashion. So, for example, rather than take the usual 'the BBC is inherently tied to the licence fee and to get rid of it would destroy it' approach many take, he admits to coming round to a subscription model because - paradoxically - it would free up the BBC to stop trying to be everything to everyone (and so putting out a lot of mediocre programming) and to concentrate on what it does best.

Where I hadn't seen eye-to-eye previously, Maconie mostly persuaded me to his viewpoint - which I found remarkable. For example, like him I am grammar school educated, but am totally in favour of comprehensives. But I'd always thought having private schools was an acceptable hat tip to choice, where Maconie makes very strong arguments as to why they should be at minimum relieved of their charitable status and preferably got rid of.

Another example of him winning me over is on re-nationalising the railways. Two things have always made me suspicious of this. I can remember how awful British Rail could be (where I quite like our local GWR franchise). And I worked for a nationalised company (BA) that went private and it was so much better after privatisation. But BA has real competitors on its routes to restrain its business practice, where the privatised railways don't. I can now see it just doesn't make sense to have private railways companies (or utilities for that matter).

A remarkable book, then. My only regret is that there isn't a bit more of the travel writing - Maconie manages to incorporate a bit, but not as much as I'd like. Since the political message is pretty much the same throughout, it can feel a little repetitive after a while. But this doesn't make it any less an excellent piece of writing - and especially telling at the time of reading when the virus crisis means that the state is having to play a very big part in all our lives. As I write, the Labour Party is about to elect a new leader. But they haven't got the right person standing. With Maconie in charge, they would be unbeatable.

The Nanny State Made Me is available from and


Popular posts from this blog

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's recent gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some ex

Which idiot came up with percentage-based gradient signs

Rant warning: the contents of this post could sound like something produced by UKIP. I wish to make it clear that I do not in any way support or endorse that political party. In fact it gives me the creeps. Once upon a time, the signs for a steep hill on British roads displayed the gradient in a simple, easy-to-understand form. If the hill went up, say, one yard for every three yards forward it said '1 in 3'. Then some bureaucrat came along and decided that it would be a good idea to state the slope as a percentage. So now the sign for (say) a 1 in 10 slope says 10% (I think). That 'I think' is because the percentage-based slope is so unnatural. There are two ways we conventionally measure slopes. Either on X/Y coordiates (as in 1 in 4) or using degrees - say at a 15° angle. We don't measure them in percentages. It's easy to visualize a 1 in 3 slope, or a 30 degree angle. Much less obvious what a 33.333 recurring percent slope is. And what's a 100% slope