A salutory reminder of the sophistication of AI hallucinations

I'm not an AI luddite. Although I would never use AI to write something, I'm happy to use it as part of a research process. But something I'm very aware of is that nothing it says should be taken on trust without independent verification. Andrew Stephens passed on an example which I detail in full below. He was researching material on health and safety and asked ChatGPT for an example of a breach by a UK broadcasting organisation that involved actual injury and a formal legal penalty.

Here's what it came up with. It's important to read down to his follow-up question 'what is the source for the above example' - a useful bit of prompt engineering. I've highlighted it in red below.

📍 Incident: BBC fined after technician crushed by a studio door

Broadcaster: BBC
Date of Incident: January 2018
Location: Broadcasting House, London
Legal Outcome: BBC fined £28,000 in 2020

🛠️ What Happened:

A BBC studio technician was crushed by a motorised door at Broadcasting House.
The door closed on the worker’s shoulder and neck, causing serious injury.
It turned out the door had a known fault, and the safety sensors failed to detect the person standing beneath it.

⚖️ Health and Safety Investigation:

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigated the incident.
They found the BBC knew about faults with the door mechanism but had not taken action to fix them in a timely manner.

💸 Legal Consequences:

The BBC pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 3 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, which requires employers to properly assess workplace risks.
They were fined £28,000 plus costs.

🧾 Lessons Highlighted:

Even a high-profile, resource-rich organisation like the BBC is not exempt from basic health and safety responsibilities.
The case underscored the importance of maintaining workplace equipment, particularly when it poses a risk to people on site.

Would you like a list of other UK broadcasters with similar incidents? ITV and Channel 4 have had a few as well, particularly around on-location filming.

what is the source for the above example

Apologies for the earlier confusion. Upon reviewing the available information, I could not find a verified incident where the BBC was fined £28,000 for a technician being crushed by a studio door at Broadcasting House in 2018.

Image by Aidin Geranrekab from Unsplash

These articles will always be free - but if you'd like to support my online work, consider buying a virtual coffee or taking out a membership:

See all Brian's online articles or subscribe to a weekly email free here

Comments

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's 2010 gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some exp...

Why backgammon is a better game than chess

I freely admit that chess, for those who enjoy it, is a wonderful game, but I honestly believe that as a game , backgammon is better (and this isn't just because I'm a lot better at playing backgammon than chess). Having relatively recently written a book on game theory, I have given quite a lot of thought to the nature of games, and from that I'd say that chess has two significant weaknesses compared with backgammon. One is the lack of randomness. Because backgammon includes the roll of the dice, it introduces a random factor into the play. Of course, a game that is totally random provides very little enjoyment. Tossing a coin isn't at all entertaining. But the clever thing about backgammon is that the randomness is contributory without dominating - there is still plenty of room for skill (apart from very flukey dice throws, I can always be beaten by a really good backgammon player), but the introduction of a random factor makes it more life-like, with more of a sense...

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5. However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor...

Search This Blog