Skip to main content

Fraudulent sales pitch

Have we got good enough protection against unscrupulous online phone sales?

The phone call came at 8:40 this morning. 'Hello,' I was told, 'I'm calling from your telephone provider, offering reduced rates.' She started waffling on about reducing the line rental and even owing us some money. I interrupted. 'Who is my provider?' Long pause. 'Sorry?' I might have started sounding a bit aggressive at this point: 'You must know who you are!' 'This is BT. Do you have broadband?' Whoa, now. I went into attack mode: 'If you were BT, you'd know.' The response is a long pause. 'You must know if I've got broadband. You tell me.' Another pause. 'Sorry, I said I'm from EE...' I told her this was a fraudulent call and hung up.

Now I have no idea if she was really from EE or if this was an out-and-out scam - she certainly wasn't from the UK - but either way, this was a clear attempt to fraudulently persuade me into agreeing to change to a different contract, or just to get bank details to rip me off, by lying about who was calling.

The trouble is, I really don't know who I can sensibly complain to - even if it was EE, and I have evidence of that, I'm sure it would be denied. And, of course, it was an international call with no caller ID, so no come back and no TPS protection.  I'm seriously considering just blocking all international calls from now on.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's recent gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some ex

Which idiot came up with percentage-based gradient signs

Rant warning: the contents of this post could sound like something produced by UKIP. I wish to make it clear that I do not in any way support or endorse that political party. In fact it gives me the creeps. Once upon a time, the signs for a steep hill on British roads displayed the gradient in a simple, easy-to-understand form. If the hill went up, say, one yard for every three yards forward it said '1 in 3'. Then some bureaucrat came along and decided that it would be a good idea to state the slope as a percentage. So now the sign for (say) a 1 in 10 slope says 10% (I think). That 'I think' is because the percentage-based slope is so unnatural. There are two ways we conventionally measure slopes. Either on X/Y coordiates (as in 1 in 4) or using degrees - say at a 15° angle. We don't measure them in percentages. It's easy to visualize a 1 in 3 slope, or a 30 degree angle. Much less obvious what a 33.333 recurring percent slope is. And what's a 100% slope