Skip to main content

Big Data? So what?

I'm delighted to say that my new book, Big Data is now available... but you may think 'So what?' data's not exactly new. What's the fuss all about? This extract from the introduction explains why:

It’s hard to avoid ‘big data’. The words are thrown at us in news reports and from documentaries all the time. But we’ve lived in an information age for decades. What has changed?

Big data has enabled Netflix, for instance, to take risks that conventional networks could never afford - and to target its marketing in a way that was never before possible. And big data is not just about business: among other things, it has the potential to transform policing by predicting likely crime locations; to animate a still photograph; to provide the first ever vehicle for genuine democracy; to predict the next New York Times bestseller; to give us an understanding of the fundamental structure of nature; and to revolutionise medicine.

Less attractively, it means that corporations and governments have the potential to know far more about you, whether to sell to you or to attempt to control you. Don’t doubt it – big data is here to stay, making it essential to understand both the benefits and the risks.

The power of big data derives from collecting vast quantities of information and analysing it in ways that humans could never achieve without computers in an attempt to perform the apparently impossible.

Data has been with us a long time. We are going to reach back 6,000 years to the beginnings of agricultural societies to see the concept of data being introduced. Over time, through accounting and the written word, data became the backbone of civilisation. We will see how data evolved in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to be a tool to attempt to open a window on the future. But the attempt was always restricted by the narrow scope of the data available and by the limitations of our ability to analyse it.

Now, for the first time, big data is opening up a new world. Sometimes it’s in a  flashy way with computers like Amazon’s Echo in the home that we interact with using only speech. Sometimes it’s under the surface, as happened with supermarket loyalty cards. What’s clear is that the applications of big data are multiplying rapidly and possess huge potential to impact us for better or worse.

Big Data is available from and


Popular posts from this blog

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's recent gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some ex

Which idiot came up with percentage-based gradient signs

Rant warning: the contents of this post could sound like something produced by UKIP. I wish to make it clear that I do not in any way support or endorse that political party. In fact it gives me the creeps. Once upon a time, the signs for a steep hill on British roads displayed the gradient in a simple, easy-to-understand form. If the hill went up, say, one yard for every three yards forward it said '1 in 3'. Then some bureaucrat came along and decided that it would be a good idea to state the slope as a percentage. So now the sign for (say) a 1 in 10 slope says 10% (I think). That 'I think' is because the percentage-based slope is so unnatural. There are two ways we conventionally measure slopes. Either on X/Y coordiates (as in 1 in 4) or using degrees - say at a 15° angle. We don't measure them in percentages. It's easy to visualize a 1 in 3 slope, or a 30 degree angle. Much less obvious what a 33.333 recurring percent slope is. And what's a 100% slope