Skip to main content

Forget the two car family - now we have the two broadband family

Sneaky new router hiding behind the TV
It's several weeks since we acquired our Apple TV box and it is getting very heavy usage. The quality of TV shows and movies from iTunes and Netflix is much better than I expected - generally indistinguishable from ordinary TV.

But a problem has reared its head. Inevitably the Apple TV box takes a hefty chunk of our internet bandwidth. If one person is watching TV this way and someone else wants to download a file or watch something on YouTube, the viewing becomes pretty well impossible, with lots of pauses and hiccups.

Where we live we can't currently get ultra-high speed broadband, because there is neither cable TV nor fibre optic cabling. (I find this bizarre in a yuppy estate built less than 10 years ago, but who can fathom the minds of BT and Virgin?) But luckily there was a solution.

As it happens, we have two phone lines into the house, one for my business, one for home. Our internet has always come off the business line. So I bit the bullet and got broadband on the home phone as well. In one of those rare bits of sensible planning by the housebuilder, there is a phone socket behind the TV, so I was able to hardwire the Apple TV to the new router, while our computer-based internet use still remains on the old router. Web heaven.

As an added bonus, if I want to do two heavy things at the same time, I can always hook up on the new router's wifi - and if my business broadband goes down (which it has twice so far for at least a day each time), I have a fallback. It isn't hugely expensive either... but somehow it does feel decidedly decadent, being a two broadband family.

Comments

  1. That fallback idea is good, but did you get the two connections from different providers? If they go to the same ISP, it is extremely likely that when one of the connections is down, the other one is as well. If the physical connections run in the same bunch of cables, connect to the same DSL multiplexer and continue from there in the same gigabit ethernet or whatever... wherever one of your connections fail, the other one will fail as well.

    Your solution is just fine for the added bandwidth requirement, of course. But if you want failover, the other connection should be done with a different technology. A popular way to do it where I live is to have the primary connection with ADSL (or something similar) and have the failover with a 3G modem. Many cheap routers provide the failover mechanism which works nicely.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good point, though both times I've had problems so far, the business line has stopped working while the 'home' line has continued, so it seems to have been a telcomms problem rather than an ISP problem. In such circumstances I may still get a fallback - but in the end it wasn't my main reason for doing this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's pretty slick - all that writing beginning to pay then :-)

    I must say that we miss our Virgin cable. 'Play it again Sam' (as we used to call it) was great, i.e., 'catch up' tv.

    We're on BT here - so I recognise that router. When we first moved here - actually, before that even - I checked out the likely connection speeds and found that BT were going to put in their Infinity network. The actually month it was to be available slipped a bit, but it's here now. However I don't know that I want it – for starters we get a good 6Mb (4Mb at the worse), and that's fine for me. Plus, BT have pissed me off a bit with their cold calling about it (ok, so I did click a link once that said I'd be interested in their Infinity stuff). The other day a guy called to tell me how vastly superior the new network was to their old one – basically, he was saying that what I was using was crap – and that just made me angry; as in, so you're happy to sell me crap (even though it's anything but) and then charge me for something that won't drop-out etc – how dare you!
    We've also just been mailed about BT Vision (don't know how this compares Brian) for £1 a week. Should I shouldn't I?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think I'd go for Infinity, Peet, but we have four of us in the house, all using the internet, plus that hungry Apple TV box.

    Also it's a bit like the old 'go for the fastest PC you can afford, as in 2 years time you'll be surprised how slow it is.'

    Don't really know a lot about BT Vision, but I assume its video-on-demand is as bandwidth hungry as the Apple box - so it would hog your 6Mb if you had it and used it...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's recent gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some ex

Which idiot came up with percentage-based gradient signs

Rant warning: the contents of this post could sound like something produced by UKIP. I wish to make it clear that I do not in any way support or endorse that political party. In fact it gives me the creeps. Once upon a time, the signs for a steep hill on British roads displayed the gradient in a simple, easy-to-understand form. If the hill went up, say, one yard for every three yards forward it said '1 in 3'. Then some bureaucrat came along and decided that it would be a good idea to state the slope as a percentage. So now the sign for (say) a 1 in 10 slope says 10% (I think). That 'I think' is because the percentage-based slope is so unnatural. There are two ways we conventionally measure slopes. Either on X/Y coordiates (as in 1 in 4) or using degrees - say at a 15° angle. We don't measure them in percentages. It's easy to visualize a 1 in 3 slope, or a 30 degree angle. Much less obvious what a 33.333 recurring percent slope is. And what's a 100% slope