Skip to main content

Why I might vote 'out' in the referendum

Here's the thing. I have done my best to assess the actual information, rather than scaremongering, from both sides and at the moment, neither has swayed me. Here's my logic for therefore voting out:

  1. My vote won't decide what happens. *
  2. If I vote 'in' I seem to be saying 'things are fine with the EU,' but they aren't
  3. If I vote 'out', then I'm adding weight to the argument the government needs to do more to distance us from the less palatable aspects of the EU. 
The usual objection to this kind of voting to make a point is 'But if everyone voted like that, we would be in a mess.'

I'm sure I don't need to point out to you the logical error in that argument. But just in case I do, we are talking about unconnected events. The way I vote will not have any influence on how other people behave. The 'What if everyone...' argument has no merit because my action is independent. 

* OK, strictly speaking, it could be totally balanced with my vote being the decider, but that is ridiculously unlikely. 

Comments

  1. cromercrox6 May 2016 at 12:11

    I'm voting Brexit, too. Like you, I'm conflicted. There are many good things about Europe, including free movement of people; that arguing about the shape of bananas is better than fighting one another, and so on. However, there are many bad things, notably (in my opinion) that the European Commission is not directly accountable to the electorate; it's a financial quagmire (the EU has never passed one of its own audits); member states conspire to bend the rules they have created for political reasons (the entry of Greece into the EU, the illegal French ban on British beef, etc); and that the Common Market, once a free-trade area, has gotten much too big for its boots (we never signed up for a European Army, a European Foreign Policy Representative and so on.) The Euro of course is a complete disaster. Mr Cameron hasn't managed to make any inroads into any of these in his 'Euro-Deal'. I can't see that these formidable structural obstacles can be fought from the inside, as the vested interests are too well-entrenched. Therefore (with some trepidation) I'm voting to leave.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Paul6 May 2016 at 14:07

    Brian, you might be underestimating the influence that your blog carries. It might well be that the many, many thousands who read this all say, "Hmm, he has a point there. I think I'll vote that way". With great power comes great responsibility.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brian Clegg6 May 2016 at 17:19

      It did strike me that, while doing it is independent, telling people about it isn’t. But then I thought, that doesn’t matter, as no one takes this seriously.

      Delete
  3. James Marinero7 May 2016 at 08:59

    Brexit definitely. 'With great power comes great responsibility' - of course - the EU has the power but little responsibility. Their accounts have not been signed-off in years. I really believe that the UK will be better off outside. As to Obama, OECD, IMF et al, they are afraid of change. Change scares the crap out of politicians and institutions - yet when they attempt it themselves they screw it up (e.g. Iraq).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's 2010 gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some exp...
118 comments
Read more

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor...
25 comments
Read more

Why backgammon is a better game than chess

I freely admit that chess, for those who enjoy it, is a wonderful game, but I honestly believe that as a game , backgammon is better (and this isn't just because I'm a lot better at playing backgammon than chess). Having relatively recently written a book on game theory, I have given quite a lot of thought to the nature of games, and from that I'd say that chess has two significant weaknesses compared with backgammon. One is the lack of randomness. Because backgammon includes the roll of the dice, it introduces a random factor into the play. Of course, a game that is totally random provides very little enjoyment. Tossing a coin isn't at all entertaining. But the clever thing about backgammon is that the randomness is contributory without dominating - there is still plenty of room for skill (apart from very flukey dice throws, I can always be beaten by a really good backgammon player), but the introduction of a random factor makes it more life-like, with more of a sense...
6 comments
Read more