Skip to main content

Travels with my iPhone

I was on a visit to London yesterday to give a talk at St Margaret's School in Hampstead.

The much maligned railway performed magnificently - the trains were on time, I got a seat both ways, and there was some constructive fiddling at Didcot station to save me money. I was coming back in the peak, so the natural thing was to get an any time return. But the cunning person at Didcot issued me an off peak return/travel card for the tube, plus a single to return in the peak - saving a magnificent £4. Okay, it wasn't a fortune, but I would have been none the wiser if I hadn't been offered it.

The iPhone's rail information app did its job on timetable details, underground trains appeared as if by magic as I arrived on the platform, and I was soon disgorged in Hampstead, often described as 'leafy' Hampstead. There were a lot of trees in the street, but from my viewpoint it was more 'maze-like' Hampstead. The route from the tube station to the school was a real tangle, with no obvious straight line route in sight. Plus, the station itself is on the corner of a conjunction of roads, and I hadn't a clue which way I had to go.

I was a bit dubious about using the maps function on the iPhone, because I thought I would look something of a plank, navigating around the place with a phone - but it worked beautifully. I asked for a route from where I was to the school's address (lifted effortlessly from my address book) and off it went, guiding me on a wiggly route including a pedestrian only section that seemed to minimize the distance. The only thing it got wrong was the naming of one road, but it was obvious from the locator on the map where I was.

I found it surprisingly easy just to glance at the screen to confirm my heading without even breaking stride - it worked much better than expected. The only problem I encountered was that I had not powered down my iPhone for many days, and this seems over time to make it harder to pick up a 3G signal, needed to display new maps. Once I'd switched it off and on again it was fine, but for a while I was cursing Hampstead as being 3G-proof (though I did manage to snaffle a WiFi connection from someone's house as I passed).

I had intended to listen to a podcast of last Friday's News Quiz on the way back on the train, but I ended up in the quiet carriage, so instead used recently installed Stanza to read part of The Time Machine on the iPhone, which worked better than I expected. Entertainment was also provided by a very chunky chap opposite, who was juggling an iPhone and a Blackberry, frantically interacting with both. It was almost street theatre.
Labels:

Comments

  1. cromercrox8 May 2009 at 13:17

    That maps function is uncanny. I hope the next iPhone update contains a direct brain-machine interface.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's 2010 gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some exp
117 comments
Read more

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor
25 comments
Read more

Why backgammon is a better game than chess

I freely admit that chess, for those who enjoy it, is a wonderful game, but I honestly believe that as a game , backgammon is better (and this isn't just because I'm a lot better at playing backgammon than chess). Having relatively recently written a book on game theory, I have given quite a lot of thought to the nature of games, and from that I'd say that chess has two significant weaknesses compared with backgammon. One is the lack of randomness. Because backgammon includes the roll of the dice, it introduces a random factor into the play. Of course, a game that is totally random provides very little enjoyment. Tossing a coin isn't at all entertaining. But the clever thing about backgammon is that the randomness is contributory without dominating - there is still plenty of room for skill (apart from very flukey dice throws, I can always be beaten by a really good backgammon player), but the introduction of a random factor makes it more life-like, with more of a sense
6 comments
Read more