Skip to main content

What is it about BMWs?

A BMW, it seems
If I'm honest I am not a big fan of BMWs. I can't imagine every buying one: while I know at least two really nice people who drive them, I experience an awful lot more unpleasant people driving them. They seem to be more pushy, nasty drivers for some reason. And for that matter, there isn't a BMW model where there isn't another car I'd rather have.

However, even as a non-fan, I have to have admit that BMWs are superbly engineered - which is why I am so baffled about their attitude to security. Recently in the news there has been a lot of fuss about BMWs with those automatic key fob thingies being easy to break into. Despite being aware of this, apparently BMW don't feel it's their responsibility to sort things out. Which isn't good.

Of itself, this is a one-off concern. But the fact is it's not the first time BMWs have been identified as being easy to break into. A good number of years ago, my car was broken into in a car park in Windsor. (You may think Windsor is a nice place, but I've only had cars broken into twice, both times in Windsor.) The thieves smashed a window to get a few cassette tapes and the (rubbish) car radio. My car wasn't a BMW - but I learned something interesting that night.

A policewoman came out to examine the scene. In conversation she pointed out that, in a way, it was a pity that my car wasn't a BMW as they were so easy to break into. Apparently, she said, there was a fault in the automatic locking mechanism, and if you bashed a BMW just there (she indicated on a nearby example) the locks popped open. For her benefit I won't say whether or not she actually demonstrated it, but it was painfully easy. Of course that was back then - this doesn't work on today's cars. But even so, as Lady Bracknell might have said, to mess up one locking mechanism is unfortunate; to mess up two is careless.

Image from Wikipedia
Labels:

Comments

  1. Peet21 September 2012 at 12:22

    I know one person with a BMW that's nice - but, like you, I find most of the rest of them to be dangerous, and bloody nasty basically: they seem to think speed limits apply to non-BMW owners only, and that the outside lane of motorways should be exclusively for their use!

    Google says:

    mercedes drivers are jerks:6
    bmw drivers are jerks:1,950
    audi drivers are jerks:9

    ReplyDelete
  2. Peet21 September 2012 at 12:24

    'Unknown' is me - peetm.

    For some reason, even though I select to sign-in with Google, I can never seem to post a comment to your blog that way.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Claire21 September 2012 at 13:16

    My whole street except mine got broken into several months ago. I guess they didn't like tiny blue yaris's whos back seat was filled with 24 rolls of kitten soft toilet paper ( there was a special on in the local pharmacy. Just like to say I don't have a toilet paper fetish.) Now I just hide my yaris away out of sight in the garage. ( not from the thieves..but from the neighbors ..the shame of it)

    ReplyDelete
  4. laurasdad21 September 2012 at 20:01

    Cars with personalities...there's a thought. I've often mused about why a car seems to mirror the personality of its owner. The BMW owners you've already mentioned but what about the over priced, underpowered Mercs or the big Land Rovers or Porsche Cayennes; it won't be fair to commit to print what I think about each of these as some of my best friends seem to own one (or more) of them, but it's always occurred to me that the more humble a person the less likely they are to have one of these monsters and will contend themselves with a rather old banger or a quiet no nonsense economy car, or even a small unloved people carrier.

    I'm sure others will have more to say about this but it's a fair issue as all those car leasing companies will tell you about their most popular company cars, and have statistics to support which make and model is safest.

    ReplyDelete
  5. David Howkins26 September 2012 at 11:36

    It's funny Brian, there was a middle aged, fairly timid manager at BA who drove a BMW and I heard him explaining to someone how he drove it 'hard' and not aggressively. I couldn't quite discern the subtle difference myself.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Brian Clegg26 September 2012 at 15:22

    I suppose hard is using it to the limits, aggressively is using it up to the limits on someone else's tail...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unknown14 March 2013 at 17:35

    At Windsor? How ironic! Anyway, I’m not really a huge fan of BMW too, but I cannot deny the fact that they’re a good kind of car. I’ve been driving a Lexus car for almost 2 years now, and I’d say it’s doing a great job serving its purpose. Its security features are quite outstanding!

    Prince Moss

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's 2010 gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some exp...
118 comments
Read more

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor...
25 comments
Read more

Why backgammon is a better game than chess

I freely admit that chess, for those who enjoy it, is a wonderful game, but I honestly believe that as a game , backgammon is better (and this isn't just because I'm a lot better at playing backgammon than chess). Having relatively recently written a book on game theory, I have given quite a lot of thought to the nature of games, and from that I'd say that chess has two significant weaknesses compared with backgammon. One is the lack of randomness. Because backgammon includes the roll of the dice, it introduces a random factor into the play. Of course, a game that is totally random provides very little enjoyment. Tossing a coin isn't at all entertaining. But the clever thing about backgammon is that the randomness is contributory without dominating - there is still plenty of room for skill (apart from very flukey dice throws, I can always be beaten by a really good backgammon player), but the introduction of a random factor makes it more life-like, with more of a sense...
6 comments
Read more