Skip to main content

Amazon Marketplace: angel or devil?

I've seen a number of articles and letters in authors' publications bemoaning the existence of Amazon Marketplace. I think it's worth putting the story straight as it's by no means black and white.

Just to be clear what I'm talking about, if you got to the page for a book on Amazon, you will see over on the right something like this. It's an opportunity to buy new and used versions of the book from sellers other than Amazon. The mighty online bookseller doesn't do this out of the kindness of its heart - it takes a cut - but both seller and Amazon benefits from the purchase.

There are broadly three types of Amazon Marketplace sale. The first is new books from a catalogue seller. This is a company that's a virtual bookshop. They use an electronic catalogue and when you buy a book from them, they just order it direct from a distributor or publisher. From the author's viewpoint, this is no different from any other bookshop selling the book. The author will still get their royalty and all is well with the world.

Secondly there are one-off new sales. These might be unwanted presents, or a reviewer or author selling off unwanted copies. This is a relatively small group of books - not anything for authors to panic about. And anyway, often it's authors doing it. For instance if you look at the Amazon.co.uk listing for my book Upgrade Me and go into its Marketplace entry you will see the cheapest entry is from Creativity Unleashed, selling signed copies. That's me - and as an author I have no problem with it.

Finally there are the secondhand books. These, I admit, can be a worry for authors. If someone intended to buy a new copy from Amazon, with its accompanying royalty, and instead decides to to buy a secondhand copy, the author (and the publisher) loses out. This is true. However, quite a lot of people will prefer a new copy - and those who buy a secondhand copy may well not have stumped up the full price anyway. If someone buys a secondhand copy and they like it, it is likely to encourage buying the next book new when it comes out.

Best of all, secondhand copies are often of books that just aren't available new. Amazon now lists lots of out of print books where the only copies are secondhand ones. Better that a reader can buy one of these, rather than not at all.

I accept absolutely Marketplace will result in some lost sales. And it's sometimes a place of madness. So many people list books at 1p without spotting that this limits the amount the seller gets from the book to £1.58. Any large format book is liable to cost more than this to post - the seller will make a loss (or realize this and cancel the sale). However, on the whole I don't think Marketplace does as much damage to authors and publishers as many fear.

Comments

  1. But second-hand books have already been bought once, right? I like the second hand market on Amazon and elsewhere online as it is a way to get books that you simply could not get before the Internet. Two examples - I bought one of my daughters "The Painted Garden" by Noel Streatfield (spelling wrong, sorry) and "Lottie and Lisa" by Erich Kastner, both unavailable and both from small bookshops in Wales if I recall (as it turned out). In fact both editions were identical to the ones I remembered having as a child, prompting me to wonder whether, via some incredibly circuitous route, they actually were the same editions, as I have no idea where they went.

    Authors also should factor in that if someone buys a book second hand or gets it via BookMooch or similar "passing on" site, then that person has been exposed to the author, and might then well go on to buy others of his or her books.

    The postage thing - I have in the past sold one or two things via Amazon - mainly unwanted videos and DVDs - until I found it not worth the hassle - and in fact the postage does work out OK because what Amazon charges the buyer is less than what it charges the seller. So even at 1 p you can make a slight profit, and if you have enough things to sell and can be bothered, it can add up. I know people who say they do it!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Maxine - I think you're just agreeing with what I'm saying! Obviously authors would prefer two new sales, but one new and one secondhand isn't as bad as it seems.

    The £1.58 I quote is what Amazon pays you, including postage, if you sell at 1p. I've seen books advertised as 1p that would cost at least £5 to post...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, sure, I was agreeing with you. I think there is some sliding scale for Amazon marketplace sellers if the item is heavy, from dim recollection.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sorry. Maxine, bit under the weather so didn't pick this up! I've been selling books for years on Amazon Marketplace and have never seen a different postage allowance. You get more if you send to (say) Europe, and less for a DVD than a book, but there appears to be a flat rate for a book for ordinary markeplace sellers. (The pro sellers who get mentioned explicitly on the main page can set their own shipping rate.)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's 2010 gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some exp

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why backgammon is a better game than chess

I freely admit that chess, for those who enjoy it, is a wonderful game, but I honestly believe that as a game , backgammon is better (and this isn't just because I'm a lot better at playing backgammon than chess). Having relatively recently written a book on game theory, I have given quite a lot of thought to the nature of games, and from that I'd say that chess has two significant weaknesses compared with backgammon. One is the lack of randomness. Because backgammon includes the roll of the dice, it introduces a random factor into the play. Of course, a game that is totally random provides very little enjoyment. Tossing a coin isn't at all entertaining. But the clever thing about backgammon is that the randomness is contributory without dominating - there is still plenty of room for skill (apart from very flukey dice throws, I can always be beaten by a really good backgammon player), but the introduction of a random factor makes it more life-like, with more of a sense