Skip to main content

The Edwardian Diet

I'm back in action and refreshed, in part from my absence from the e-world and in part from a holiday - we've been on a cruise. It might seem I was cheating in saying I was voluntarily withdrawing from the internet for a while, but thanks to the wonders of satellite communications I could have stayed connected while on-board - I guess it made staying offline a lot easier, though.

Life on the Oriana made me think of what it must have been like to be one of the Edwardian gentry. A constant round of meals, punctuated by assorted entertainments and strolls around exotic places. In fact, it made me wonder why our current obesity epidemic wasn't happening 100 years ago among the rich.

After all, by the time you've had a cooked breakfast including those country house essentials devilled kidneys, a heaped buffet lunch (cold collation, my dear), perhaps afternoon tea, a five or six course dinner and attempted to resist the always available service to produce a little something more to eat, the pounds are bound to pile on. And this is day after day. Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining. It was a great holiday. But how did they manage to live like this all the time and not blow up like airships? Any suggestions gratefully accepted.

Comments

  1. Quite true, I hadn't thought of that - but I don't think it would be enough to counter the bloat!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's recent gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some ex

Mirror, mirror

A little while ago I had the pleasure of giving a talk at the Royal Institution in London - arguably the greatest location for science communication in the UK. At one point in the talk, I put this photograph on the screen, which for some reason caused some amusement in the audience. But the photo was illustrating a serious point: the odd nature of mirror reflections. I remember back at school being puzzled by a challenge from one of our teachers - why does a mirror swap left and right, but not top and bottom? Clearly there's nothing special about the mirror itself in that direction - if there were, rotating the mirror would change the image. The most immediately obvious 'special' thing about the horizontal direction is that the observer has two eyes oriented in that direction - but it's not as if things change if you close one eye. In reality, the distinction is much more interesting - we fool ourselves into thinking that the image behind the mirror is what's on ou