Tuesday, 18 October 2011

Turning a pale blue

I'm shocked. I have discovered that I'm feeling more positive about the Conservatives than I ever have before. I'm not a Conservative voter, which makes this decidedly worrying. (Apart from my very first election when, as a student, I voted that way as a protest against all the holier-than-thou preaching from the left wing students.)

The thing is, my heart is Liberal Democrat, but my head is Conservative. This is why, despite voting Liberal for many years, for a couple of elections I supported New Labour. I really thought we might be getting the best of the two, while the reality seems to show we got the worst. This is also why I was very pleased to have the coalition.

It's not that I agree with all Conservative policies. I think their ideas on the NHS are poor, and their approach to university fees is wrong, for example. But I've never yet come across a government that had policies 100% in line with my own - and this is hardly surprising. In the end, I am pro-business. I know capitalism is terrible - but like democracy, despite being awful, it's better than any of the alternatives. I like the idea of limiting government interference. And I like the idea of people being rewarded for making an effort.

What made me realize that the balance had tipped is that apart from the issues mentioned above, where a topic is contentious in the coalition, I tend to come down on the blue side, rather than the yellow.

Now there's a problem here. My friend Henry Gee has discovered that it's not a good thing to be a Conservative in the primarily left wing science community. His colleagues seem to feel that his political inclinations represent a moment of madness, and he should be regularly told how stupid he is about this. As the writing community also has more than its fair share of the left leaning, I expect I might get one or two nasty comments myself. But I felt it was important to be honest.

I'm open to persuasion to return to the fold. My heart still loves that black bird on a yellow background. But my head subscribes to the Times iPad edition.

2 comments:

  1. I dislike tribal politics. I watched my parents, who are staunchly Labour, desperately trying to defend Gordon Brown then - once he'd gone - admitting what a disaster he'd been. It struck me as so wrong to be defending a politician you regard as a "disaster" simply because he belongs your party.

    I find that the main parties, and some of the smaller ones, all have some policies I agree with an others I loathe. Sometimes makes it difficult to decide how to cast my vote but maybe voting choices should be a bit difficult.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You know what they say: if you're not a communist when you're 20, you have no heart. If you're still a communist at 30, you have no brain. I'm happy to report I'm in possession of both :)

    In reality, I believe all politicians are to a large extent bound by social and economic forces which are to their control abilities what a supertanker is to an oar: they can influence, in the long run, but they can't steer. Currently, we're moving into an era when it's simply impossible to implement classical "right-wing" politics - the past few years have seen US Republicans voting to throw government money at banks, and the predominantly Liberal government in Sweden actually took ownership of a bank.

    And I'm beginning to believe that it's better to have a government that would, if left to their own devices, do the complete opposite of what's necessary in the contemporary climate. In Sweden, over the past two decades, we've had left-wing governments preside over drastic budget cuts and cost-saving reforms to the tax and pension systems, and now we're having a right-wing government nationalising banks. And our economy is in brilliant shape. They're even holding back some 3 billion Euro in the budget for "unforeseen expenses".

    It only becomes dangerous when the politicians are so convinced of their ideology that they ignore reality. Then you're in real trouble.

    ReplyDelete