Skip to main content

I hope these Leafs are going to fall

I've been writing a lot about sustainable business recently for a secret reason that will soon be revealed. One of the lessons I came across time and again when researching the subject (and one I've already commented on elsewhere) is that it's absolutely great having, say, environmentally friendly products. But if you really want to be serious in sustainability, you have to be able to sell those products at a similar price to the non-friendly alternative. People do want to be sustainable, but not at a huge price.

I really thought manufacturers had got the hang of this. Then along comes the Nissan Leaf. My main car use is pootling around on 5 to 20 mile journeys, so for me an electric car would be ideal. (When I do long journeys I swap cars with 'er indoors.) The Leaf looks superb. Usually the cars I feel that I really want are totally impractical. (Words like Aston Martin and Morgan spring to mind.) But I genuinely would love a Leaf. It looks good, the performance is fine and it is indubitably green. (You can argue about the greenness production side, but that's for another post.)

Great, I thought. Where do I sign up? Now an equivalent petrol car would probably start at around £12,000. Fair enough. I expected a bit of a premium, but there's a £5,000 government incentive, so that should cover the difference. After all, lesson #1 is 'don't price your sustainable products much higher than the normal ones.' So what does it cost? Prices start at £23,990. And that's with the £5,000 off.

Come on, Nissan. It might have to be a loss leader to start with, but if you get production up high enough, you can crack a decent price. You know it makes sense.

Comments

  1. Yes, the price looks unreasonable, but there are companies, and public sector organizations and quangos, who are willing to pay a lot for a greenwash. So they'll be prepared to pay quite a premium for electric cars; the economical non-viability will be not too much of an issue for many of these "early adopters".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Absolutely - there will always be early adopters. But the message if you want to get greenness/sustainability into the mainstream is you can't charge much of a premium at all - but you will still reap the reward, because the consumer can see the benefit, both to the environment and to their pocket (in this case, electricity is a lot cheaper per mile than petrol).

    But even if there is a long term saving, if you price the green product with a significant premium, you still will only reach the niche and won't change the world.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Quite. The environmentalist response will of course be to adopt ways that try to force people to choose the "green" product. They plan things like making it mandatory to buy a certain amount of "green" electricity if you buy any electricity at all. Or force you to get an electric car if you want to park downtown. Etc. There's a lot of ingenuity around when people invent ideas for what to force other people to do, or in general, what to do with other people's money.

    I don't really put any blame to Nissan, they just do what is economically (etc) viable.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's recent gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some ex

Which idiot came up with percentage-based gradient signs

Rant warning: the contents of this post could sound like something produced by UKIP. I wish to make it clear that I do not in any way support or endorse that political party. In fact it gives me the creeps. Once upon a time, the signs for a steep hill on British roads displayed the gradient in a simple, easy-to-understand form. If the hill went up, say, one yard for every three yards forward it said '1 in 3'. Then some bureaucrat came along and decided that it would be a good idea to state the slope as a percentage. So now the sign for (say) a 1 in 10 slope says 10% (I think). That 'I think' is because the percentage-based slope is so unnatural. There are two ways we conventionally measure slopes. Either on X/Y coordiates (as in 1 in 4) or using degrees - say at a 15° angle. We don't measure them in percentages. It's easy to visualize a 1 in 3 slope, or a 30 degree angle. Much less obvious what a 33.333 recurring percent slope is. And what's a 100% slope