Skip to main content

Are you reading the runes right in these difficult times?

After the furore over the legal action involving Simon Singh and recent developments in that area I wonder if there are other opportunities for a rational backlash. I offer without comment and in full the following press release I received yesterday:

More and More Business Owners are turning to Psychics

Russell Grant Astrology, the leading authority in over 30 years of Astrological advice has been nurturing a carefully selected team of Psychics and Mediums for some time now - selected from the best psychics throughout the UK; only a very small percentage of readers who ask to join the team are ever accepted after various tests from Russell himself and members of his team.

1 in 3 calls used to be regarding a love related matter - until it was evident over the past few months that more and more business owners have been calling up to get advice during this tough climate; Russell’s psychic team at http://www.russellgrantpsychics.co.uk state.


Using psychics and mediums for business use is not unusual, in fact they are usually employed to suss out prospective employees, solve mysteries within the workplace or indeed work hand in hand with astrologers and Financial Directors to plot the business moving forward.


“Many worried self-employed men and women have been calling me during the past few weeks” one Psychic commented, “I was very pleased to be able to guide a number of people into opening their minds to other avenues within their businesses to limit the losses they have been facing over the past few months”.


Turning a business around in a recession is a very difficult task - especially when you have the added financial pressure; it is difficult to think logically and this usually results in Crisis Management - additional stress for the main person involved which leads to all other illnesses, relationship issues and so on.


In addition, it has been reported that Church ministers have seen a significant rise in attendance amongst bankers, analysts and other city workers at the lunchtime services within the financial districts in London.


During these very uncertain times, whether it’s Psychics, Astrologers or Religion that you seek solace in, it certainly can’t do any harm… so here’s to giving it a try.


Boggle.

Comments

  1. I dunno, Brian. I mean, some of these Big Biznis ideas, like Credit Swap Derivatives or whateva, seem a lot like stargazing to me.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's recent gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some ex

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Which idiot came up with percentage-based gradient signs

Rant warning: the contents of this post could sound like something produced by UKIP. I wish to make it clear that I do not in any way support or endorse that political party. In fact it gives me the creeps. Once upon a time, the signs for a steep hill on British roads displayed the gradient in a simple, easy-to-understand form. If the hill went up, say, one yard for every three yards forward it said '1 in 3'. Then some bureaucrat came along and decided that it would be a good idea to state the slope as a percentage. So now the sign for (say) a 1 in 10 slope says 10% (I think). That 'I think' is because the percentage-based slope is so unnatural. There are two ways we conventionally measure slopes. Either on X/Y coordiates (as in 1 in 4) or using degrees - say at a 15° angle. We don't measure them in percentages. It's easy to visualize a 1 in 3 slope, or a 30 degree angle. Much less obvious what a 33.333 recurring percent slope is. And what's a 100% slope