Come on baby, sign my Kindle

There's no doubt about it, having a signed book is something special. I treasure the ones I've got on my shelves, and although I'm always very hesitant asking people when they buy my books if they'd like me to sign them, they always beam and say 'Yes, please!' It turns a book into a momento.

This is often pointed out as one of the disadvantages of ebooks, but now you can get your ebook signed. Sort of.

I have come across people with actual signatures on their Kindles, but this could get messy, and somehow isn't right, but the new website Kindlegraph lets you request a dedication from authors who have signed up for the so far free service. (Thanks to Carol Rose on Litopia for pointing this out.)

After some online jiggery pokery, of which more in a moment, you received a PDF on your Kindle that has a picture of the book cover, a pseudo-handwritten dedication and a signature, which can be the author's real signature if they managed to get it into the computer. So the signed dedication is actually separate from the book, but linked to it by having its cover photo in the document.

I think it's a neat idea which could be quite popular, though the website is very new and rather skeletal at the moment. To find an author you have to search on a page with a straggly list of authors, then click on the button for the book (provided the author has added it). Then the fun starts. You can't get a button unless you log in with a Twitter account, which is a bit scary (and less than useful if you aren't on Twitter). I had hoped to send myself a dedication but the next stage requires you to modify settings for your Kindle to receive a document from Kindlegraph's email. I don't have a Kindle, I use the Kindle reader software on my iPad. So I was unable to carry on.

But in principle I should then have had a request flagged up from reader Brian to author Brian. As author Brian I would then write a dedication. I don't know if I would get any information, like who this person is, who they'd like the dedication made out to, any comments to help me make up a dedication, or whether I would just be firing in the dark - I'll have to see what happens if I get a request.

Finally, then, the reader gets their dedication.

Will it replace the signed book? Of course not. A signed book is a special object. This is just another document, admittedly personalized, on someone's Kindle. And a signed book usually reminds of meeting an author face-to-face. The Kindlegraph is remote and there never was any contact between writer and reader. Even so, it's better than nothing, and deserves a good pat on the back for the developer of Kindlegraph for thinking of a rather neat little website.

Comments

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's 2010 gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some exp

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5. However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why backgammon is a better game than chess

I freely admit that chess, for those who enjoy it, is a wonderful game, but I honestly believe that as a game , backgammon is better (and this isn't just because I'm a lot better at playing backgammon than chess). Having relatively recently written a book on game theory, I have given quite a lot of thought to the nature of games, and from that I'd say that chess has two significant weaknesses compared with backgammon. One is the lack of randomness. Because backgammon includes the roll of the dice, it introduces a random factor into the play. Of course, a game that is totally random provides very little enjoyment. Tossing a coin isn't at all entertaining. But the clever thing about backgammon is that the randomness is contributory without dominating - there is still plenty of room for skill (apart from very flukey dice throws, I can always be beaten by a really good backgammon player), but the introduction of a random factor makes it more life-like, with more of a sense

Search This Blog