Skip to main content

What, me? Middle class?

We Brits are famous for our obsession with class. In fact it's true in most countries (put an American socialite in the wrong part of America if you doubt this), but we have always been open about it. However, it is getting more and more difficult to distinguish between working class and middle class. I am not talking about sheer ignorance. At some point leading up to the recent royal wedding I heard some chinless wonder comment with great condescension that Kate Middleton had done so well for a working class person. (After all, she only attended Marlborough, my dear.) I mean that there's real confusion for many people.

Of course there are still obvious stereotypes. No one sane would describe Nick Clegg or David Cameron as working class, for example. But many, many people occupy what is, after all, a very broad borderline. Some would really like to be working class because it feels more authentic. Others enjoy the comfort of middle class values. Whatever our hopes and desires, it is useful to get a clear picture of our own class status. So here is the beginnings of a questionnaire designed to help place yourself. It's not a test. Simply for self identification. But I need more questions. All suggestions welcome.

1. You encounter a small bowl of green goo. Do you assume it is:
A) Guacamole
B) Mushy peas

2. You taste the green goo and it turns out to be guacamole. Are you:
A) Disappointed
B) Delighted

3. You are watching TV and a visitor calls round. Do you:
A) Switch the TV off
B) Turn the sound down a bit

4. Thinking of the main living room of the house are you more likely to call it:
A) Living room or lounge
B) Sitting room

5. And do you sit on a:
A) Couch
B) Sofa

6. When talking about TV at work do you discuss:
A) Soap operas and programmes about people from Essex
B) Documentaries and serious drama (even though you watched soap operas and programmes about people from Essex)

7. Do you think that opera is:
A) High art and worth supporting
B) A waste of public funds and boring

8. Do you think the Sun is a newspaper?
A) Yes
B) No

Score 1 point for each of the following and 0 points for the rest: 1 A), 2 B), 3 A), 4 B), 5 B), 6 B), 7 A), 8 B) - the higher your score, the more middle class you are.

Comments

  1. My feeling is that class is all about money - not that working-class people have less than middle-class people, because that's often not the case. More that working-class people tend to spend their money immediately, whereas middle-class people tend to save it for a rainy day. What with the difficulties of saving money nowadays, the poor returns on investments, and general insecurities, I suspect that class distinctions are blurring.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Living room/lounge versus Sitting room? - No thanks, I go for Drawing room.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Do you use the

    a) Toilet

    b) Loo/Lavatory

    ReplyDelete
  4. John - add Drawing room to Sitting room

    Dave - that's an interesting one. I'm not sure it works as a diagnostic as many middle class people now use 'toilet' to avoid the twee euphemism. This applies to other similar ones too, though I think serviette/napkin still has some mileage.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In the words of Monty Python ... I know my place!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I can't help thinking that some of this is North v South; I used to have dinner when we lived in Manchester, now I have lunch and then we had tea when I now have dinner. Supper was an unknown meal for us although if we recognised anything is was that we ate tea late!

    And I'm definitely middle class - at least I'm taller than Corbett and shorter than Cleese - if that helps.

    ReplyDelete
  7. SETTEE not sofa!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I was wondering about settee too. As a kid from a working class background we used to call the toilet/loo the 'lav' which seems odd now considering that lavatory is the correct term - according to my very upper middle class (I imagine) headmistress of my all girl grammar school. I say it seems odd as I wouldn't have expected us working class families to use the correct, albeit shortened, word. I'm slightly confused these days as I veer between dinner and lunch at 'dinner time' but mostly still say tea for my meal at teatime - early evening. It's not that I want to change my terms just that I'm surrounded by people using different terms. :-/
    Anne Evans

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's recent gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some ex

Mirror, mirror

A little while ago I had the pleasure of giving a talk at the Royal Institution in London - arguably the greatest location for science communication in the UK. At one point in the talk, I put this photograph on the screen, which for some reason caused some amusement in the audience. But the photo was illustrating a serious point: the odd nature of mirror reflections. I remember back at school being puzzled by a challenge from one of our teachers - why does a mirror swap left and right, but not top and bottom? Clearly there's nothing special about the mirror itself in that direction - if there were, rotating the mirror would change the image. The most immediately obvious 'special' thing about the horizontal direction is that the observer has two eyes oriented in that direction - but it's not as if things change if you close one eye. In reality, the distinction is much more interesting - we fool ourselves into thinking that the image behind the mirror is what's on ou