Skip to main content

Curse you, Ben and Jerry's!

I think it is absolutely outrageous that Ben and Jerry's can sell a smallish tub of ice cream (about the size of two angry fists) for £4 - I bet you don't pay the equivalent $5.86 for one in the US. You would have to be absolutely stupid to pay these prices.

What makes it particularly painful is that one daughter is addicted to Cookie Dough, another to Phish Food... and yes, I admit it. I love Caramel Chew Chew.

Ben and Jerry - I appeal to you. You are personally bankrupting us. Stop it immediately.


  1. Do you know if they've stopped doing Cherry Garcia? I can't find it anywhere!

  2. Peet - according to their UK website they still have it as frozen yoghurt... see

  3. What's 'Phish Food' then, Earth Being?

  4. Here's B&J's explanation:

    'Chocolate ice cream with marshmallow, caramel swirls and fish shaped chocolately chunks.'

    Apparently named after a band called Phish, and the UK's best selling Ben and Jerry's flavour. See their website (comment above) for more details.

  5. Life's never been quite the same since Coffee Coffee Buzz Buzz Buzz stopped appearing in the Tesco freezers.

    To avoid bankruptcy (and uncontrolled weight gain) we only buy B&J when it's on special offer. Because an open tub is an empty tub...

  6. Err - they are Unilever now. Sold out. If this is in anyway relevant ...

  7. I concur! My last tub of Cherry Garcia almost bankrupted me.

  8. On the subject of Coffee Coffee Buzz Buzz Buzz, I was at the cinema last night and they still had some at the B&J's stand, selling it off cheap as a graveyard flavour.

  9. Apparently you can make an ice-cream with practically any flavour. I had some off a stall in Polperro, Cornwall, some years ago, that was apple crumble flavour. And I've had Christmas Pudding flavour. Both tasted very good. I've even heard of some bizarre savories such as Egg and Bacon Flavour. Marmite flavour might be fun. At this time of year I'd like to sample Matzo Balls and Chicken Soup flavour...


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's recent gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some ex

Mirror, mirror

A little while ago I had the pleasure of giving a talk at the Royal Institution in London - arguably the greatest location for science communication in the UK. At one point in the talk, I put this photograph on the screen, which for some reason caused some amusement in the audience. But the photo was illustrating a serious point: the odd nature of mirror reflections. I remember back at school being puzzled by a challenge from one of our teachers - why does a mirror swap left and right, but not top and bottom? Clearly there's nothing special about the mirror itself in that direction - if there were, rotating the mirror would change the image. The most immediately obvious 'special' thing about the horizontal direction is that the observer has two eyes oriented in that direction - but it's not as if things change if you close one eye. In reality, the distinction is much more interesting - we fool ourselves into thinking that the image behind the mirror is what's on ou