Skip to main content

Yo, ho, ho and a boxful of books!

There be pirates out there.

At least two websites, Scribd and Wattpad, are set up as 'document sharing' sites - it's Napster all over again, but this time for documents instead of music. And, despite the mind numbing tedium of it, plenty of people seem happy to sit down and scan a whole book so they can upload a pirate copy to one or both of these sites.

Recently there's been quite a furore over Scribd particularly, whipped up by literary agent Peter Cox. Discovering full texts of books from popular authors like J. K. Rowling, he has stirred up something of a media storm about this theft. We've seen newspapers like the Times jump in, and most recently Sky News.

As Jo Brand points out in the Sky piece, the problem here is that the majority of authors aren't multimillionaires, they're scraping a living from the 50p per copy or so they get from book sales. And every copy stolen this way is taking money directly from them. No piracy can be encouraged, but where most movie and music piracy does take a little from the very rich, most book piracy hits people who can't afford to be stolen from - the vast majority of illegally copied books on these sites are not by big name authors.

The sites' owners say they will take down anything illegal if they are alerted to it - but this puts the onus on thousands of authors to check. It's just not acceptable. We should see publishers and authors' organizations banding together to insist that site owners who host this type of pirate material should be held responsible. If that means manually checking each submission, so be it. If they won't, it's time they were walking the plank!



    Feel free to add this email to the comments section if you like.

    For an alternative view about "piracy" and ebooks I would recommend reading Cory Doctorow. He sums it up nicely in his book "Little Brother", the biggest problem for most authors seems not to be piracy, but obscurity. You may think his views are rather extreme, but for a site which appears to be able to make "giving away" work, try I tend to agree with Cory Doctorow. There are an awful lot of books out there and the difficult thing is for them to catch my attention (this is where sites like yours, of course, come into the picture). Putting up a chapter on a web site free of charge is a good way of marketing a book. Most people still prefer reading a book on paper rather than electronically so making an electronic version available free can perhaps lead to more sale rather than fewer. (The only statistics I have seen on this are from Baen books, and they seem to think it is worth it).
    The one thing I do not want to see is publishers going the same way as the music industry and penalizing their readers. I have already suffered in this respect - I bought an mp3 tune from a website with drm and can no longer play it as I have switched computers and have lost the original order. I also bought a textbook on thermodynamics for my Palm, just to see if electronic books were something for me. Again, I can no longer access it for reasons unknown. This means that I will NEVER again buy anything with DRM - twice bitten, thrice shy!
    Lastly, in case you are wondering, I personally would never download a pirate copy of anything that I would have otherwise considered paying for. In fact I think I can claim that I have never downloaded any pirate copies of mp3 files/software/or indeed books. I do borrow books from the library though! (and listen to the radio)



  2. David - I've no problem with people offering free samples (I do this with all my ebooks) - or even the whole book for free. It's when someone else makes it freely available that it's an issue.

    Although at the moment it's not a huge problem, these scanned books are usually readable in ebook readers, and as they become more common, so the problem will grow.

  3. I probably shouldn't say much here, but I've had problems with one of these sites in my professional capacity. They pirate stuff, and when you contact them they are niceness itself and say, yes, they'll remove stuff but in the meantime bludgeon you with a lot of legalese which takes a lot of time and effort to get through. I guess most authors wouldn't havee the time, resources or speclaized knowledge to fight them, and so they get away with it. My feelings about this are not printable.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is 5x3 the same as 3x5?

The Internet has gone mildly bonkers over a child in America who was marked down in a test because when asked to work out 5x3 by repeated addition he/she used 5+5+5 instead of 3+3+3+3+3. Those who support the teacher say that 5x3 means 'five lots of 3' where the complainants say that 'times' is commutative (reversible) so the distinction is meaningless as 5x3 and 3x5 are indistinguishable. It's certainly true that not all mathematical operations are commutative. I think we are all comfortable that 5-3 is not the same as 3-5.  However. This not true of multiplication (of numbers). And so if there is to be any distinction, it has to be in the use of English to interpret the 'x' sign. Unfortunately, even here there is no logical way of coming up with a definitive answer. I suspect most primary school teachers would expands 'times' as 'lots of' as mentioned above. So we get 5 x 3 as '5 lots of 3'. Unfortunately that only wor

Why I hate opera

If I'm honest, the title of this post is an exaggeration to make a point. I don't really hate opera. There are a couple of operas - notably Monteverdi's Incoranazione di Poppea and Purcell's Dido & Aeneas - that I quite like. But what I do find truly sickening is the reverence with which opera is treated, as if it were some particularly great art form. Nowhere was this more obvious than in ITV's recent gut-wrenchingly awful series Pop Star to Opera Star , where the likes of Alan Tichmarsh treated the real opera singers as if they were fragile pieces on Antiques Roadshow, and the music as if it were a gift of the gods. In my opinion - and I know not everyone agrees - opera is: Mediocre music Melodramatic plots Amateurishly hammy acting A forced and unpleasant singing style Ridiculously over-supported by public funds I won't even bother to go into any detail on the plots and the acting - this is just self-evident. But the other aspects need some ex

Which idiot came up with percentage-based gradient signs

Rant warning: the contents of this post could sound like something produced by UKIP. I wish to make it clear that I do not in any way support or endorse that political party. In fact it gives me the creeps. Once upon a time, the signs for a steep hill on British roads displayed the gradient in a simple, easy-to-understand form. If the hill went up, say, one yard for every three yards forward it said '1 in 3'. Then some bureaucrat came along and decided that it would be a good idea to state the slope as a percentage. So now the sign for (say) a 1 in 10 slope says 10% (I think). That 'I think' is because the percentage-based slope is so unnatural. There are two ways we conventionally measure slopes. Either on X/Y coordiates (as in 1 in 4) or using degrees - say at a 15° angle. We don't measure them in percentages. It's easy to visualize a 1 in 3 slope, or a 30 degree angle. Much less obvious what a 33.333 recurring percent slope is. And what's a 100% slope